Sectionalism Apush Dbq Sample Essay

With the advent of a common patriotic mindset, and progressing further into the eighteen-teens, economic stimulation and expansion came with the transportation and subsequent market revolutions that changed the face of American domestic manufacturing. With the advice of such men as John C. Calhoun, whose ideas granting the minority veto power are represented in today’s system of jurisprudence and legislative due process, government, to a greater degree, procured the creation of transportation venues. Calhoun disregarded the cynical message of his congressional counterparts, such as John Randolph. Randolph saw urbanization as the brutalizing force by which the poor are kept poor and “the others run in the ring of pleasure, and fatten upon them” he instead argues that, although disunity is a very real prospect, the message validating economic stagnation has no redeeming qualities and thus the former must be adopted in place of the latter. Essentially, Calhoun argued for the eradication of bitter distrust amongst social superiorities and for a united front towards American prosperity. The federal government accepted Calhoun’s argument—as is evident in such pivotal undertakings as the Erie Canal of 1817. At this time, unification and the disregard of dissimilarities were responsibly introduced. In Gibbons vs. Ogden, John Marshal elucidates the role of government and that of the state, showing how the latter is subordinate to the former in all issues regarding the regulation of commerce—which includes transportation efforts. With regards to pecuniary dealings, the Second Bank of America, originating during the Monroe Presidency, foreshadows additional disputes that were put down during the Era of Good Feeling. With the grand decision in Maryland vs. Madison, Marshall rejects the idea that “the powers of the general government…are delegated by the states” and establishes, citing Article 2 Section 8, or the “necessary and proper” clause, that the Federal government remains the supreme power, preeminent above all state-based legislatures and courts. Similarly, in Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Marshall ruled in favor of the federal government by denying states the right to interfere with contracts. According to Marshall, a college charter qualified as a contract. Although controversy ensued, the culmination of these Supreme Court decisions made it so that there was no question as to what the laws were and, by whom, the laws were rightly enacted. In this sense, the general atmosphere calmed.

Dbq Era of Good Feeling Ap Us History Essay

717 WordsDec 29th, 20133 Pages

The period after the war of 1812 was labeled “The Era of Good Feeling” by historians. Some people believe that this is an accurate label of this time period, but others disagree. Due to the emergence of sectionalism- concern with local interests, and nationalism- patriotic feelings and self pride, people had mixed feelings about this time period. Many people felt that times were high, and that nationalism and sectionalism could only bolster the union, while others thought that it was sectionalism and nationalism that caused disunion. Some of the documents used in this essay support the claim that the period after 1812 was an era of good feelings. Other documents will oppose this claim with proof from their own perspectives. Document B…show more content…

(Doc. D). The case says that it would be difficult to sustain this proposition. Anna Hayes Johnson of South Carolina wrote to her cousin in North Carolina complaining about the “unhappy business which has filled with consternation all our city” and how nothing can save them. She writes that fifty to sixty percent of the leaders are in jail, and twenty of them have been convicted and sentenced. (Doc. G). The people living during this time period do not seem to think as highly of it as the people discussed in the previous paragraph did. Documents E and I both portray different feelings about this era. Document H is a political map that exemplifies sectionalism perfectly. During the presidential election of 1820, James Monroe won every vote but one, but in 1824, the votes were split up between four different candidates, and the results were just as varied. Each state had its own mind and voted for who they felt was right, and not just as one union. Document E is a density map that shows how populated each square mile of land was in 1820. Much of the land had less than two inhabitants per square mile, and the people living there felt that they shouldn’t be taxed the same as somewhere where there were ninety or more inhabitants like in the northeast. This is a prime example of people who did not think this was “The Era of Good Feeling.” “The Era of Good Feeling” is a label given to the time period

Show More

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *